However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who operates a mutual factory called C in the period of harmony C.

On November 19, 2015, at around 10:00, the Defendant used a string machine used in the above plant to send the string machine to repair companies, and used the string machine to freight trucks, and the victim D(64) was under the supervision of the machinery in order to fix the string part of the machinery to the strings.

In such cases, the machinery can be cut off in the process of placing the machinery on the truck, so there was a duty of care to take necessary measures such as safety devices against the defendant.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to take safety measures and applied the machinery to cargo trucks without any safety device, and thereby covered the victim’s bridge while the machinery ceases to be balanced.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as a cage cage cage cage cages, which requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 268 (Selection of Imprisonment without prison labor);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Execution (a) is above Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the degree of injury of the victim, but the defendant recognizes his mistake and reflects his mistake, partial compensation for the damage to the victim after the closure of pleadings