beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.06.13 2016고단1236

조세범처벌법위반

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 200 million.

Defendant

A Where a fine is not paid, 20,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of B Co., Ltd. in Jinju, and Defendant B Co., Ltd is a corporation established for the purpose of construction business.

1. Defendant A

A. On July 10, 2015, the Defendant issued false tax invoices in accordance with the Value-Added Tax Act equivalent to KRW 300,000,000 in value of supply without supplying goods or services to E hotel construction work at the above B’s office, from that time to that time, the Defendant issued the same year without supplying goods or services to E hotel construction work.

8. Until May 1, 200, the Plaintiff issued a false tax invoice in accordance with the Value-Added Tax Act equivalent to KRW 1,798,636,000, total supply value by the same method three times in total, as described in paragraphs 1 through 3 of the [Attachment] list of crimes.

B. On July 10, 2015, the Defendant was issued a false tax invoice under the Value-Added Tax Act equivalent to KRW 46,000,000 for the supply price without being supplied with goods or services from the said G at the G office located in Nam-si, Namyang-si. From that time until October 25 of the same year, the Defendant was issued a false tax invoice under the Value-Added Tax Act equivalent to KRW 177,00,000 in total by the same method three times, as indicated in paragraphs 4 through 6 of the attached crime list, from around October 25 of the same year.

2. Defendant B corporation

A. The Defendant from around July 10, 2015 to the same year

8. By May 1, 200, A, a representative of the Defendant, issued a false tax invoice in accordance with the added-value tax law equivalent to KRW 1,798,636,000, total supply value over three occasions, as described in [Attachment] Nos. 1 to 3 of the List of Offenses in the Crimes.

B. From July 10, 2015 to October 25, 2015, the Defendant received a false tax invoice in accordance with the Value-Added Tax Act worth KRW 177,000,000, total supply value over three occasions, such as the list of crimes Nos. 4 through 6 in relation to the Defendant’s business from around July 10, 201 to around October 25 of the same year.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The defendant;