However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 10:05 on the ground that the Defendant unilaterally cut the phone call from the victim C (36 tax) who is a public official in charge of delinquent affairs at the 211 Musan tax office B and office in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan, 15, and that the Defendant unilaterally cut the phone call from the victim.

A dogper shall be spad, spad, spad.

“In doing so, the part of the victim’s chest was tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with the performance of duties related to delinquent affairs by the victim who is a tax official, and at the same time, the victim needs approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of an injury diagnostic certificate and diagnostic certificate;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., the violation of the instant crime and the violation of the Defendant’s act of assault);