If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

On March 31, 2015, at around 03:21, the Defendant: (a) took a bath view on the grounds that the Defendant was arrested and carried out as a flagrant offender, and the Defendant was able to capture the said FF’s franch as a flagrant offender, and subsequently interfered with the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation of the crime of the police officer walkinging to the left part of the said F, one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the law to the statement statement made by the police officer in G and F;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;