However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

B served as the head of E’s material department in Gyeongbuk-do, and Defendant A served as a cargo engineer in charge of the transport of co-days in the above company.

The Defendants heard the lawsuit that the victim F, working as the general director of the above E, embezzled the funds of the above E, and conspired to raise money from the victim by threatening the investigation agency to the effect that he would know about the embezzlement of the victim without giving money to the victim.

According to the above conspiracys, Defendant A, around 17:00 on August 30, 2017, followed by the above conspiracy, followed the victim’s “Mara Mara Mad. 50 million won.”

will be detained.

“To the effect that the Defendants would not be aware of KRW 50,00,000,000 were threatened, and Defendant B drafted and delivered to the victim a written complaint stating the embezzlement, etc. of the victim around September 10, 2017.

As above, the Defendants conspired to threaten the victim and received a remittance of KRW 40 million from September 19, 2017 to the Daegu Bank Account in the name of Defendant B (Defendant B’s wife) around September 19, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement by the prosecution against F, and statement by the police (the sequence 5 in the list of evidence);

1. A president of the F;

1. Copy of the complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (a copy of passbook B);

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 350(1) and 350 of the Criminal Act; Articles 350(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment

1. The Defendants in a suspended sentence: (a) the Defendants’ reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (b) the Defendants recognized their mistakes and did not repeat the sentence; (c) the victims voluntarily withdrawn their complaint against the Defendants; (d) the victims and the above E’s representative director wanting to take the Defendant’s prior action; (e) the Defendants did not have the same criminal records; (e) the degree of damage; (e) the degree of damage; and (e) the degree of crime and the record