A. The Plaintiff is the owner of CY 1,403 square meters at Siljin-si, and the Defendant is the owner of a container gambling room on the above ground (around 6 square meters) and of the used goods loaded on the above ground.

B. On June 1, 2013, the Defendant leased and used the above land from the Plaintiff, and received an order to reinstate the Defendant’s illegal diversion of farmland from the Si of Jinjin on July 11, 2013.

C. Accordingly, upon the Plaintiff’s request, the Defendant: (a) drafted a memorandum of implementation on August 20, 2013 and September 10, 2013; and (b) agreed to collect facilities on the ground of the said land and recover them and restore them to its original state unless consultation with the Jin-si and consultation is reached.

After that, even though there was no agreement between the defendant and the actual situation, the defendant does not implement the above agreement.

2. The judgment deeming confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act, and the defendant did not submit a written answer even after being served with a duplicate of the complaint, and since he did not attend the court on the date for pleading, it shall be deemed that all the plaintiff's allegations have been led to confession under Article 150