특수재물손괴등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 28, 2019, the Defendant destroyed special property: (a) around 21:05, on the ground that he did not receive his own apology at the dispute with Da (25 years of age) on the apartment parking lot B in Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Seoul, the Defendant received twice a part of the Fsp motor vehicle front part of the victim E, which was owned by the victim E, for which no person was aboard as the front driver of the car.
After all, the defendant, using a dangerous object vehicle, destroyed the victim's front part of the ice car to be 220,000 won repair cost.
2. On October 28, 2019, the Defendant driven a DNA motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.137% from the 1km section from the parking lot in front of the Hongcheon-gun G Apartment Hdong, Gangwon-do, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Seoul, to the roads in front of the Ielel-gun, Gangwon-do.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement of E and C;
1. A written estimate for an investigation report;
1. A survey report on the actual condition, a notice of the results of the control of drinking driving, a report on the circumstantial statements of drinking drivers, and a next red inquiry;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing field CCTV images CDs;
1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act that choose a penalty, Articles 148-2 (3) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of fines;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant, who is a dangerous object, destroyed the victim's automobile by shocking it, while committing each of the crimes of this case, which is conducted by drinking, the nature of the crime is not good, and the blood alcohol concentration density of the defendant is considerably high.
However, the fact that the defendant repents his mistake, and shows the form of reflection late, the degree of shock caused by the damaged vehicle, and the damage of the above vehicle.