Text

1. Defendant B’s appeal shall be dismissed;

Reasons

Unless there are special circumstances, the defendant was not aware of the service of the judgment without negligence if a copy of a complaint of legal principles related to the legitimacy of the appeal for subsequent completion, and the original copy of the judgment, etc. were served by service by public notice. In such a case, the defendant was unable to observe the peremptory period due to a cause not attributable to him, and thus the defendant is entitled to make an appeal for subsequent completion within two weeks from the date on which such cause ceases to exist. "the date on which the cause ceases to exist" refers to the time when the party or legal representative becomes aware of the fact that the judgment was served by public notice, rather than the time when the party or legal representative became aware of the fact that the judgment was served by public notice (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da39734, Sept. 6, 2007). In addition, if the defendant knew of the fact that the judgment was served by public notice and there are special circumstances to automatically recognize the fact that the judgment was served by public notice by public notice, and it is reasonable to deem that the cause not attributable