2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Defendant, as an enterprise in the position of an event to build and sell a neighborhood living facility under the name of “E” (hereinafter “the instant building”) on the land of two parcels, such as the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu C, and D, (hereinafter “E”), announced that the Defendant sold Fho Lake (hereinafter “F”) and G (hereinafter “G”) located on the side of the office entrance of the instant building, among the instant buildings, to the convenience store business through the guide book (Evidence Nos. 5 and 6; hereinafter “instant guide book”).

B. On September 3, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendant to purchase G units at KRW 438,243,00,00, and paid the Defendant the down payment of KRW 43,824,00 on the same day. Upon receiving a loan from H unions, the Plaintiff paid KRW 43,824,00 to the Defendant on October 14, 2016; and on March 2, 2017; and on June 2, 2017, the Plaintiff paid KRW 43,824,000 to the Defendant for the first or fourth intermediate payment.

[Total Amount paid: 219,120,000 won (=43,824,000 x 5)]

On the other hand, on September 3, 2016, under the premise that the sales contract for F was concluded, the Plaintiff paid the Defendant the down payment of KRW 42,197,00 in advance, and on September 19, 2016, concluded a sales contract with the Defendant to purchase the F amount of KRW 421,967,00 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant sales contract” including two sales contracts concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant with respect to the F and subparagraph (hereinafter referred to as the “instant sales contract”). Upon receiving loans from H association, the Plaintiff paid KRW 42,197,00 each of the instant sales contracts to the Defendant as the first intermediate payment through the fourth intermediate payment on June 2, 2017.

[Total Amount paid: 210,985,000 won (=42,197,000 x 5).

Although there was no express indication that there was the columns in F, there was a pole of 1.43m wide and 6.28m long from F, in fact, there was a pole of 1.43m long and 6.28m long. For this reason, the Plaintiff’s mistake or Defendant’s Defendant on January 5, 2018.