beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.05.11 2017고단818

도로교통법위반(음주운전)

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A- On February 8, 2017, at around 01:02, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle in the Espo-type under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.144 percent from the Spain parking lot located in Guro-gu Seoul, Seoul, to around 01:30, around the same day from the Spain parking lot located in Guro-gu, Seoul to the roads front of the D parking lot located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul at around 01:30 on the same day.

2. Defendant B- The Defendant, at around 01:30 on February 8, 2017, was on the road in front of the D parking lot as indicated in paragraph (1) and on the spores A’s sporespores in the workplace where drinking was driven, as described in paragraph (1), stated that “A was arrested from G during the process of the police station in Seoul, Seoul, and the complaint was raised,” and that “when spores are spores and spores, etc. in a letter of indictment, spores,” but the Defendant consistently denied that there was no fact at the time of sporesing, and the Defendant’s statement by G police officers did not be memory because there was no yellow dust that is facing what is facing the spores.

“The statement is made to the effect that “......”

In light of this, the evidence submitted by Defendant B alone is difficult to recognize that Defendant B intentionally assaulted the adjacent interest of G.

Therefore, it is recognized as above without any changes in the indictment.

Violenced.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic control.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of Defendant A and some of Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Each police statement made to H and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (applicable to the aforementioned dmark), a report on the circumstances of the driver's license, and an inquiry into the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 148-2 (2) 1 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the same Act, and Article 148-2 (2) 2 of the same Act, and Article

1. Attraction of a workhouse (Defendant B) Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act