If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

The Defendant: (a) forged the power of attorney in B’s name in order to claim that B was not an employee working in the said fireworks because B did not receive wages from the Defendant; (b) was an operator of the “D High School” in the Daegu North-gu Northern District Office; and (c) submitted B’s certificate of career to the said school to assert that B was not an employee working in the said fireworks.

1. On August 24, 2018, the Defendant forged private documents, stating “B” and “A” in the name column of a person delegated by an inspection body using the inspection body on the proxy form for the purpose of uttering at the administrative office of “D High School” as “B” and “B” in the delegation column.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged a letter of delegation in the name of private document B, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), exercised the right of representation as if it were a document duly formed, in which the name of the above school administrative office could not be known, as stated in paragraph (1) was forged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement corresponding to the defendant in court;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Investigation report (to hear telephone statements from the staff of the administrative office of the D High School);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (a letter of delegation prepared by a suspect);

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;