When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant has been financially assisted by lending money from the unmarried third type B from time to time to time among the 8 South and North Korea.

During that process, the Defendant’s 20,000 won that he borrowed from the Youngnam Agricultural Co., Ltd. around December 2007 died on or around November 201, the Defendant heard the horses that “a person who is a joint guarantor to color a new joint and several guarantor” from the said Youngjin Agricultural Co., Ltd., and without the consent of the above B, tried to join the Defendant as a joint and several guarantor for the above obligation.

On December 7, 2011, the Defendant stated “B” in the joint surety name column of joint and several guarantors requesting replacement of joint and several guarantors, without authority, at the office of Young-gun, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, 210-1, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Seoul, the Defendant was in possession of the following as “YAD” in the main disturbance of joint and several guarantors.

B The letter of request for replacement of joint and several guarantors in B’ name, which is a private document on the rights and obligations affixed with B, was forged, and on the same day, the said No. 330 was submitted to the employees in charge of the above No. 1 copy of the request for replacement of forged joint and several guarantors.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a written request for replacement of complaint heads or joint guarantors;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment for more than twice a fine, and that he/she has led to the confession of the instant crime, and the sentencing grounds indicated in the record, shall be determined as set forth in the text of the Criminal Procedure Act.