If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. Around 20:00 on July 2013, the Defendant heard the horses from the “Snbnb,” located in the R of the Victim P and Q, which was operated by the Defendant, to request the victim Q from the victim Q to pay KRW 1,050,000 for accommodation charges, the Defendant used the victim’s appearance and used the victim’s certificate of registration of the party’s place of business, and, if so, the Defendant saw the victim to have the face value, she dried up with the walk, such as walking the door.

The defendant had a frighter victim, who was frighten, pay the above accommodation fee, and had the victim pay the same amount of property interest.

2. On July 12, 2013, the Defendant and T with the obstruction of business entered the above U FO on the 20:00 on July 12, 2013, and the Defendant interfered with the victim’s in their influencing duties by jointly taking advantage of the following expressions: “I am flusium, flusium, and flusium, flusium, flusium, and flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, and flusium,” and “T is flusium, flusium,

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. T police suspect interrogation protocol;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to P and Q

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Articles 350 (1), 314 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;