여신전문금융업법위반
All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.
The prosecutor appealed from the court below on the ground that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendants (the defendant A's fine of KRW 10 million, and the defendant B's fine of KRW 5 million) is too unfluent and unreasonable. However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments in this case, it is not recognized that each sentence imposed by the court below to the defendants is too unfluent and unfair on the grounds as stated in its reasoning.
Therefore, since all appeals filed by the prosecutor against the defendants are without merit, they are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.
[Attachment 3, 10 and 11 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act (Article 70 (3) 3 and Article 19 (5) 3 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act) are amended as "Article 70 (2) 3 and Article 19 (4) 3 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act (amended by Act No. 13068, Jan. 20, 2015; hereinafter the same)", "Article 70 (4) 6 and Article 19 (5) 4 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act", "Article 70 (3) 6 and Article 19 (4) 4 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act", and "Article 70 (4) 4 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act".