A. As to KRW 110,074,293 and KRW 10,000 out of the said money, from December 29, 2012, and 10,000. < Amended by Act No. 4503, Mar. 13, 193>

On October 18, 1996, the defendant decided to exclude the plaintiff whose appointment period expires on February 28, 1997 at the Teachers' Personnel Committee held on October 18, 1996, and notified the plaintiff on November 18, 1996 that the appointment period expires on February 28, 1997.

(2) On April 2, 2003, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant to confirm the status of professor on April 2, 2003, and the Daegu District Court rendered a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim on May 25, 2005 (2003Gahap5348).

On May 25, 2007, the appellate court filed an appeal against the plaintiff and changed the purport of the claim into the invalidity of the decision rejecting the reappointment and the claim for damages. On May 25, 2007, the Daegu High Court affirmed the part of the claim confirming the invalidity of the decision rejecting the reappointment on the ground that the plaintiff, who is the president of the defendant University, was based on the examination table for reappointment teachers in order to exclude the plaintiff, who is the president of the defendant University, from the subject of reappointment without undergoing the minimum procedures necessary for reasonable and objective evaluation. However, the claim for damages was dismissed on the ground that the three-year short-term extinctive prescription period from the time the first decision rejecting the reappointment was completed (2005Na3879).

After the final appeal, the Supreme Court confirmed the invalidity of the decision to refuse reappointment on July 29, 2010, and sentenced the judgment that reversed the claim for damages after February 27, 2003 (2007Da42433).

After remanding, the Daegu High Court rendered a judgment on November 25, 201, against the Plaintiff on KRW 446,151,125 and its delay damages, and against the Plaintiff from March 1, 201.