A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Defendant

A is the chairman of the E apartment unit in Osan City, and the defendant B is the representative of the above apartment unit.

1. Defendant A

A. On April 23, 2014, around 21:00, the Defendant suffered injury, such as “damage to light water,” which requires approximately 14 weeks of treatment to the victim, on the face and back of the victim, when there was a dispute with the victim B.

B. On November 3, 2014, at around 23:00, the Defendant: (a) assessed the victim’s right eye part of the victim’s right eye on one occasion due to the small-scale illness in the middle of the dispute over the representative meeting before the Simsi E Apartment Management Office in Yongsan-si; and (b) assessed the victim about seven days of gymbane and gymites that require treatment.

2. Defendant B

A. On April 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 21:00, at the time of 18 U.S. classical elementary school in Osan-si; (b) No. 1.

During the dispute with the victim A, he/she abused the victim's face by drinking at several times.

B. On November 3, 2014, around 23:00 on November 3, 2014, the Defendant injured the Defendant 1-B before the Management Office of the E-Housing in Osan-si.

During the dispute with the victim A, when the victim's face is taken several times due to drinking, the victim was injured by 21 days' external wounds, such as sexual shock, which requires medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

【Court of Second Instance 1】

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness B, F and G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury (investigative records No. 13);

1. The defendant A and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not make a price for the victim as shown in the 1-A of the judgment of the defendant A, and that the injury of the victim's "humf damage" is not caused by the act of the defendant A.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, namely, Defendant A and the victim B, who were frighted to drink each other at the time of the instant case, and the victim could not be used during the instant case.