However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 15:03, around D convenience stores in the Gu, Jinnam-si, Jinnam-si; (b) on the 15:03, on the 15th day of the 2017, the driver of the vehicle on which the Defendant was aboard, posted a complaint on the enforcement of G, who was a auxiliary police officer belonging to the police station in the Changwon-gu, who was a responsible police officer belonging to the police station in the Changwon-gu, with the wearing of the safety belt, and used the h's chest, who was physically sealed by the above F, in his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic control.

Summary of Evidence

Application of the police statement law to the defendant's legal statement H

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (not limited to violence exercised to police officers, but considering that such violence is divided);

3. An order to attend a course under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;