2. In light of the following, even though the judgment was based on the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflects the mistake, there is a need to strictly punish the illegal disturbance at the government office in order to establish the state's legal order and eradicate the light of public authority; there is a criminal record of obstructing the performance of official duties three times; the defendant committed the crime in this case during the suspended execution period due to the obstruction of the performance of official duties; the defendant committed the crime in this case during the suspended execution period; and other matters concerning the sentencing as indicated in the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances after the crime, circumstances after the crime, and other records and changes, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.