except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 22:00, the victim D in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, was working as an employee; (b) was able to take a sobry soup and soup; and (c) was able to take a sobry and soup to the victim on the ground that he was informed by the victim of the brying; and (d) was able to take a sobry and so on, the Defendant was unable to enter the sobry by making approximately one-hour disturbance, such as taking a bath to “the flasing and salute,” and making it difficult for customers to take a sobry and make it difficult for them to take the sobry.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's soup business by force.

2. At around 22:35 on March 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim G from the victim of the F District Police Station in the Daejeon District of the Daejeon District Police Station who was called out after receiving a report of 112, as in paragraph (1) at the above place; (b) the Defendant: (c) made soup and soup 10 customers of the said D and soup 10, the Defendant: (d) provided the victim “I amscopty flap; (d) I am the police son; (e) I am out of the soup, I want to enter the victim with the victim “I am well flabing fighting; and (e) I am am scopher and breed one time at the same time as D et al.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 314 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The victim of the crime of interference with business under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act that has no criminal record of the suspended sentence for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the same shall apply to eight times of a fine for death, or the previous five years or less, which was sentenced to a fine for bodily injury in 2012).