도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
The Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (one and half years of imprisonment) was too excessive and unfair. However, in light of all the factors of sentencing as indicated in the records and changes of the instant case including: (a) the Defendant did not receive a letter from the victim of the instant larceny; (b) the Defendant had a large number of criminal records of the same kind; and (c) the Defendant, in particular, did not know about the fact that the Defendant committed each of the instant offenses without being aware of the fact that he committed each of the instant offenses even during the period of repeated crimes due to the same kind of crime, the lower court’s sentence imposed
Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.