However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 02:30 on December 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) reported that the wife E (here, 31) sent the clothes of his wife to the Defendant within 601, a residential area located in the Busan So-gu, Busan, to the Defendant, and tried to verify whether the Defendant properly carried them in the laundry season; (b) reported that the Defendant was placed in the laundry room to the Defendant, and prevented the Defendant from taking the Victim’s hand by hand; and (c) sustained the Victim’s head debt and knee knee knee knee kne kne kne knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne kne kne kne

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement of the victim and the written diagnosis of injury;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime (the point of injury and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] General In cases where the basic area (a person subject to special mitigation) (a person subject to special mitigation) is not subject to punishment (including a serious effort to recover damage), or considerable damage is recovered, the scope of sentence comparing the applicable sentences (a.g., injury (a., type 1 and 4) with the recommended sentences: April 1 and 16 (a decision on a sentenced sentence) is disadvantageous to the victim who is the wife in April 1 and 16.

The punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the conditions of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act and the sentencing guidelines determined by the Supreme Court's Sentencing Committee, taking into account the conditions of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act and the fact that the victim has no same record