If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant, from around 20:00 on August 20, 2012 to 19:00 on August 20, 2012, the Defendant, “D” operated by the Victim C in Gyeonggi-si, as if he would pay the PC usage fee to E, an employee, but the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the PC games even if it was operated by the PC game.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving E, used PC from August 21, 2012 to around 19:00, and did not pay 22,600 won when he ordered food, such as ham, etc., but acquired financial benefits equivalent to that amount.

On August 13, 2012, from around 15:02 to around 01:30 on the following day, the Defendant: (a) was at the seat No. 43 in the Hamtop 43 operated by the victim G of the 2nd floor in Nam-si, Namyang-si; (b) even in the game, the Defendant did not pay the user fee, and (c) did not pay the user fee of KRW 10,00 and KRW 14,500,000, total of the drinking water price of KRW 4,500, and did not pay the user fee of KRW 14,500.

Summary of Evidence

"2013, 350"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. "Receipt 2013, 450";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on user fee information;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.