Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of larceny is not guilty. This judgment is rendered.

around September 30, 2014, the Defendant, around 09:20 on September 30, 2014, tried to intrude into an abandoned house in order to steal money.

피고인은 위 일시경 인천 부평구 C 102호에 있는 피해자 D(45세)의 집에 이르러 집안에 사람이 있는 것을 확인하기 위해 현관문을 손으로 노크하여 집안에 인기척이 없는 것을 확인하고 건물 뒤쪽으로 나와 반쯤 열린 창문으로 침입하기 위하여 창문 오른쪽에 있는 가스배관을 오른손으로 잡고 발은 창문 아래쪽을 지나가는 가스배관 위를 밟아 몸을 지지하는 방법으로 타고 올라가 왼손으로는 방충망을 열려고 흔들다가 위 피해자를 깜짝 놀라게 하고, 창문을 열고 침입하려다 피해자에게 발각되어 그 뜻을 이루지 못하고 미수에 그쳤다.

around 10:50 on November 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was passing ahead of “G” operated by the Victim F in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, 258; (b) discovered that the primary victim was not yet present at work; and (c) stolen clothes in the above store.

The Defendant removed a cre in front of the show place where he had neglected surveillance around the store, and removed a tent covered by the display place in front of the store, and walked with the network, and stolen a white twitts with a value equivalent to 50,000 won at the market price of the victim, who was suffering from clothes inside the store.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement "2014 Highest 8215";

1. Written statements of D;

1. On-site photographs "2014 Highest 8689";

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the site of the case and photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 322 and 319 (1) of the Criminal Act that choose a penalty (a point of attempted intrusion upon residence), Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The sentencing of Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders.