사해행위취소 등
1. As to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B Co., Ltd.: 66,086,405 UN and its related March 7, 2018.
The Plaintiff’s claim for determination as to the Plaintiff’s claim is corrected as “Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s Intervenor”. On June 28, 2018, the Plaintiff transferred the Defendants’ claim for loans to the Plaintiff’s Intervenor, and notified Defendant B Co., Ltd. on June 29, 2018, and accordingly, added the fact that the Plaintiff’s Intervenor succeeded to the instant lawsuit, the cause of the claim is stated in the annexed sheet, except for the Plaintiff’s succession to the instant lawsuit.
Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of the applicable provisions of the Acts (a judgment by deeming the Plaintiff as having been withdrawn from the Plaintiff’s assertion, and the Defendants transferred the entire subject matter of lawsuit in this case to the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor during the proceeding of the lawsuit in this case, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is dismissed for all reasons, as the Plaintiff transferred the entire subject matter of lawsuit in this case to the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor while the lawsuit in this case was pending. The Plaintiff did not answer to the claim part of the loan, and was absent at the date of the subsequent pleading, and the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor withdrawn the lawsuit in this case on July 30, 2019 through the partial withdrawal of lawsuit on January 10, 2020).