손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,372,904 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from February 28, 2013 to October 14, 2014.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The defendant's assault 1) around 01:15 on February 28, 2013, at the front parking lot of Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, where the plaintiff and the plaintiff have a horse dispute, the plaintiff's breast part of the plaintiff's breast part of the defendant's chest was faced with the plaintiff's head in the ground, and the plaintiff's head was damaged by the defendant's assault. Due to the defendant's assault, the plaintiff suffered an injury, such as blood transfusion, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "the assault of this case").
(2) The Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2,00,00 from April 4, 2013 (Seoul High Court Decision 2013 High Court Decision 201Da6136, Apr. 4, 2013), and the said order became final and conclusive around that time due to the instant assault. 2) The Plaintiff’s treatment progress from February 28, 2013 to March 23, 2013, from D Hospital to E Hospital from March 23, 2013 to E Hospital from March 29, 2012 to E Hospital from March 31, 2012 to Apr. 4, 2013, and continued to provide outpatient treatment, such as receiving respectively hospitalized treatment and outpatient treatment after that time.
[Identification Evidence: Evidence Nos. 4, 6, and 8 (including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply)
(i) entry in Eul evidence 8, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for all damages suffered by the plaintiff as a tortfeasor who has inflicted an injury upon the plaintiff by committing the assault of this case.
C. The limitation of liability: (a) the following circumstances revealed in the statements Nos. 2, 4, and 10 of the evidence Nos. 2, 2, 4, and 10 comprehensively based on the purport of the entire pleadings; and (b) the Plaintiff continued an inappropriate relationship by having known the Defendant’s identity with G and allowing him to store the Plaintiff’s body pictures on G Handphones; and (c) the Defendant, other than his mother, discovered the above pictures from G Handphones and informed the Defendant thereof, was subject to considerable mental impulse in the process.