토지인도
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B is on the line that connects 2, 3, and 4 of the annexed drawings among the area of 122 square meters in Pakistan-si.
1. Basic facts
A. On August 24, 2009, the Plaintiff completed the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to shares of 2/19 out of 122 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).
B. Defendant B, as the owner of F Miscellaneous land adjacent to the instant land, operates the parking lot on the said land, installed a mentb block fence on the line connected in sequence 2, 3, and 4 of the attached Form Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 2 of the instant land, and occupied and used part (B) of 24 square meters on the ship, which connects each point of the above drawings Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 2 in sequence.
C. Defendant C is an owner of G field 1,726 square meters adjacent to the instant land. Of the instant land, Defendant C occupies and uses a part of 76 square meters on board (D) that connects each point of 10,9, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 10 square meters in sequence among the instant land.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and the result of this court's commission of appraisal to the Director of the Korea Land Information Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff, the co-owner of the instant land, and Defendant B, the Plaintiff, the co-owner of the instant land, removed the mentble block fence built on the line connected in sequence 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 2 of the attached drawings among the instant land, and deliver the portion of the land (B) on the part of the instant land, which was connected in sequence to each point of the said drawings, 24 square meters. Defendant C is obligated to deliver the portion of the instant land (D) in sequence 10, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 10 square meters among the instant land, which was connected in sequence with each point of the said drawings.
3. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.