부당해고구제재심판정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(2) The court of first instance, which rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion, is justifiable, even if the Plaintiff’s assertion was examined in the first instance court and the first instance court, and all of the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court were examined. (3) In addition, the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance court is not significantly different from the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance court. (4) [The part written after dismissal] is referring to the expression “three times of expression.”
In the judgment of the court of first instance, two or more persons shall be deemed to be "two or more persons".
Each of the 7th and 8th of the first instance judgment's 7th of the 8th and 7th of the 8th of the 7th of the 7th of the 195.
Each "Disciplinary Committee" of the 11th, 12th, and 13th, shall be deemed to be the "Disciplinary Committee" of the first instance judgment.
On the 9th judgment of the first instance court, the 19th judgment's "criminal punishment procedure" is against the criminal trial procedure.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.