사문서위조등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
"2017 Highest 1028"
1. Crimes related to applications for deposit transactions in the name of D;
A. On April 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) stated “D”, “Seoul Northern-gu E”, and “F” in the cell phone column in the name column; and (b) written D’s signature next to the written request for deposit transaction that he/she had a driver’s license purchased on the Internet at the present location of the Daegu-gu Northern-dong Bank located in Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, Daegu-gu, and the mobile phone column; and (c) written “D” in the personal confirmation column.
Accordingly, the Defendant forged a letter of deposit transaction application in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.
B. When the Defendant filed an application for deposit transaction at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph, he/she submitted a forged application to a bank employee who was aware of the forgery.
2. Crimes related to the establishment of a new mobile phone in the name of D;
A. On April 16, 2015, the Defendant entered “D”, “Tgu North-gu E”, and “D” in the applicant customer column in the column of customer name of the mobile phone new contract in the office of “J” operated by “J” and signed D next to the office of “J”.
As a result, the Defendant forged the mobile phone new contract in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations.
B. The Defendant at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (a) submitted a forged new contract to I who is aware of the fact that he/she applied for membership of the mobile phone at the time and place.
(c)
The Defendant filed an application for joining as if he/she were to pay the mobile phone fees at the time, time, and place mentioned in the above A. A.
However, there was no intention or ability to pay the mobile phone fees because of the illegal use of D's name, and there was no special property at the time.
As above, the defendant deceivings the victim I to this end.