When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The victim C(35 years old) is a person who lives in the second floor of the operation of the D apartment in Dongducheon-si, and the defendant is a person who operates the real estate brokerage office on the first floor of the D apartment.

Around 15:40 on August 23, 2017, the defendant and the victim had a strong view on several occasions due to a usual parking problem. Around 15:40 on August 23, 2017, the above D apartment parking lot said to be parking problem, and the victim took a look at the defendant's head by pushing the defendant with his head, and the defendant was boomed with the victim's blick with his her son.

In addition, the victim prices the face of the defendant in drinking, and the defendant also inflicted bodily injury on the victim, including 14 days of spawn, spawn, tensions, etc. when the victim spawns and flads.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. On-site photographs and photographs of suspects, written statements of C Preparation, written examinations of suspects, written examinations of injuries, written examinations of suspects, CCV images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, despite the fact that the defendant is closely involved in the victim's breath, there is no fact of breathing or breathing the victim's breath as stated in the facts charged of this case, and there is no fact that the victim was injured, and the defendant's act of breathing the victim's breath constitutes legitimate defense or legitimate act.

On the other hand, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged as comprehensive consideration of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, are ① The victim is a parking problem with the defendant in an investigative agency.