However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 30, 2018, the Defendant returned home from the police officer D to the police officer assigned to the Jeju Police Station C police station, who was called the Defendant at the entrance of the brigade B at Jeju on December 30, 2018, after receiving a report of 112, “satisfing” and called the “satisf

A bath was made on the ground that he was ordered to do so, and the breath of the above D was flaped by drinking, and assaulted the left part of the D's flap on one occasion.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act is not somewhat weak, and the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the fine for the same kind of crime, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relation, environment, circumstances and results of the crime, and other circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered in comprehensive consideration.