2. Provided, That this shall not apply;

Defendant

B is back to the school of the victim I(37 years of age), and Defendant A is a creditor who lent money to the victim I through Defendant B with the victim I who has a close relationship with the victim I. Defendant C becomes aware of the victim I through Defendant B, and there is a close relationship with the victim I. Defendant E and Defendant D are ex post facto distribution with Defendant A and society, without any relationship with the victim I. On October 2013, 2013, the victim I discontinued contact with Defendant A and Defendant B with the victim when he did not fully repay the money.

From August 2014 to August 30, 2014, the Defendants: (a) sought the victim I from the victim I to receive the victim I’s above 60 million won from the victim I’s family member; (b) from August 25, 2014 to August 30, 2014, between the victim I and the victim I’s family member, the Defendants kept the victim I from the victim I’s house located in J apartment at permanent residence; and (c) parked the K K Hayst or L body-ray vehicle in the vicinity of the victim I’s house at permanent residence.

On August 30, 2014, at around 13:37, the Defendants entered the said J apartment and parked the vehicle in the apartment parking lot, etc., and waited until the victim I left the house. At around 17:30 of the same day, the victim I entered the said J apartment with the victim M&(37 years of age) who was his wife, and entered the said J apartment, and the Defendant A parked in the SP in the front of the SPP by driving the said rocketing vehicle. Defendant B reported the network from the head of SP, Defendant E, and Defendant D forced the victim I to leave the back seat of the said J apartment, and prevented the victim I from leaving the said vehicle back to the victim I, and followed the victim I by driving the said vehicle. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 20348, Feb. 13, 2014>

The Defendants are victims I as above.