beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.12.18 2014누49769

요양불승인처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the following modifications or additions of some contents. As such, the reasoning for this case is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Then, the Plaintiff’s assertion is based on the premise that the Plaintiff had worked until the time of departure confirmed by the Plaintiff’s entry and exit of the Plaintiff’s vehicle record (Evidence A No. 10), and the Plaintiff’s actual excess working hours in light of the time of entry and departure (on the other hand, after 10:0 am) in the above entry and exit record (on the other hand, after 10:0 am), following the 6nd entry and exit record.

B. The part of the 6th through 14th part of the 13th part of the 6th part of the 13th part of the 14th part of the 6th part of the 14th part of the 14th part of the 6th part of the 14th part of the 14th part of the 6th part of the 14th part of the 14th part of the 6th part of the 14th part of the 6th part of the 14th part of the 6th part of the 14th part of the 14th part of the

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.