업무방해등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, as the former lessee of 102, 504, Goyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Kuyang-gu, C apartment house 102, 504, was to proceed with a lawsuit for return of the lessor and Jeonyang-gu deposit, and during that process, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that he prepared a confirmation document proving the facts of the Defendant’s assertion and changed the fact to the victim D (M, 48 years old). However, the victim refused
On March 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim to prepare a written confirmation of facts at the F.A. F. F. F. F. F. F. D’s office in Gyeyang-gu E Commercial Building No. 106, Gyeyang-gu, Young-gu on March 14, 2016; (b) on the ground that the victim refused to do so, three persons, including customers G, H, etc., but, (c) made the attack to the victim; (d)
It is not against the law.
If we do not know the letter of confirmation, it is not sufficient to do so.
Top, this would prevent funeral services.
It is not required to be provided only in Dong and Dong.
The victim is called "," and the victim is now going to talk later because he/she has a customer.
If there is a customer, so far as there is a large amount of customer, it is necessary to do so.
Even though "the victim is expelled", it is again impossible to carry out funeral services in this context at the time of the victim.
It is not always set up in the Dong and Dong.
“Around 20 minutes were fested by sound, making a disturbance between 20 minutes.”
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's work by force, and the victimized person made a public speech to the customer as if he committed a fraud and committed a tort.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of witness D, G and H;
1. G certification;
1. According to the above adopted evidence, the injured party is unable to communicate with the injured party and the customer who has discovered the disturbance by avoiding the victim's resistance beyond the victim's mere resistance at the time and place stated in the facts charged.