The facts in the cause of the claim do not conflict between the parties, or are recognized by the statements in Gap evidence 1 through 7 (including the serial number). Thus, the defendant's claims in the decision of performance recommendation against the plaintiff were fully repaid.

Therefore, compulsory execution based on the above decision of performance recommendation should be rejected.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the costs of lawsuit are assessed against each party. It is so decided as per Disposition.