2. Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts.

3. Some of the dismissed parts of the plaintiff (Appointed) sought a judgment identical to the entries in the purport of the claim, but the above compulsory execution is rejected on the ground that the plaintiff was subject to a limited acceptance and adjudication on inheritance due to the cause of the claim, and the qualified acceptance is approved on the condition that the defendant's obligation should be repaid within the scope of the property to be acquired by inheritance. As such, the part of the plaintiff's claim that the plaintiff (Appointed Party) requested to refuse compulsory execution on the part exceeding the scope of the inherited property from the deceased B is accepted, and the part that requested to refuse compulsory execution on the inherited property is dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff's assertion itself

[This case] The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) reported that there was no active property of the deceased at the time of qualified acceptance.