However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 26, 2017, around 02:00, the Defendant opened a “D cafeteria” of the victim C’s operation in Yangsan-si B, and infringed on the said cafeteria, and stolen it by holding a small credit cooperative with which the market price of KRW 300,000 in cash owned by the victim was unknown.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Report on the occurrence of a crime (thief), the 112-processing table, photographs taken by CCTV, CCTV-free video data, the fingerprint identity verification, appraisal, report on the results of field identification, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the damaged articles left-hand photographs;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The reason for the suspended sentence of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act / [Determination of the type] / In the event that a person subject to special sentencing intrudes into a place other than the indoor residential space of the mitigated element / [Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act / [Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution / [Article 62(4)] - In the case of intrusion into a place other than the indoor residential space of the mitigated element / [decision of the area of recommendation] Special mitigation area / [the scope of recommendation] from April to January 1/6 [the scope of recommendation] - there is no criminal punishment / The main reason for the suspended sentence / [decision of the suspended sentence] who has no positive criminal punishment power (decision of the sentence] along