When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 23, 2014, around 16:00, the Defendant appeared and testified as a witness of the above court’s “2013 A. C, D, Defendant E, and F” case between Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff E, and the above court’s “2013 D, D, E, and F,” and 2013 Gohap 1048666 (Counterclaim).

1. The defendant's representative "at the time the defendant E gives 60,000,000 won in cash" to the plaintiff's representative.

The testimony “for example” to the question “,” and

2. On the other hand, Plaintiff C and D need to report the list of property, and if the details of property have been set aside for a long time, they do not have any fact to help the witness prepare the list by requesting the preparation of the list of property.”

“At the time of the testimony”;

3. On the other hand, the plaintiff's representative "at least twice, so far, the details of the property has been changed to the extent of two times, and the premium has been notified of this finite finite.

“I informed you of the answer.”

Then, whether the Plaintiff’s agent “ was informed at all”

The testimony “for example” was made to the question “.”

However, in fact, E’s lease deposit was not KRW 60,000,000, and the Defendant was aware of this fact, and there was no direct witness of E to give KRW 60,000,000 to G in cash, and there was a fact that the Defendant prepared the details of the living obligation of G with D and H and the details of the property.

Nevertheless, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory as above and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. The first statement made to C by the police;

1. Protocols of the gist of the examination of a witness (including records of recording attached thereto);

1. Judgment on the regular approval and each judgment inherited by the Seoul Family Court;

1. H's certificate of fact;

1. The following facts are acknowledged based on each of the above evidence.