근로자직업능력개발법등 위반에 대한 행정처분 무효 확인
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is operating a designated occupational training establishment designated by the Minister of Employment and Labor pursuant to Article 28(1) of the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers (hereinafter “Vocational Skills Development Act”).
(No. 7). (b)
1) Pursuant to Article 19(1) of the Vocational Skills Development Act, the Plaintiff is operating three courses for human resource managers from the Minister of Employment and Labor as follows (hereinafter “each course of this case”).
(1) Article 18(1) and (2) of the Vocational Skills Development Act (see Article 18(1) and (2) of the Vocational Skills Development Act) provides training costs for vocational skills development training in order to support autonomous vocational skills development training for workers preparing for account-based joint training courses, unemployed persons, etc., or former and new start-up businesses, who are prescribed by the Minister of Employment and Labor (see Article 18(1) and (2) of the same Act). - (Article 12 of the same Act) - (Article 18(1)2 of the same Act) - (Article 22 of the Human Resources Management Officer - (Article 22 of the same Act, which is March 29, 2013), the Plaintiff provided education to the subjects included in the course of the instant program, other than certified lifelong education teachers, while operating each of the instant courses from September 22, 2012 to June 28, 2014.
(B) The Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for the payment of training expenses for each of the instant courses from February 4, 2013 to July 11, 2014, and received KRW 89,795,880 in total as training expenses for each of the instant courses from the Defendant (Evidence No. 15) (Evidence No. 15). C. 1 of the instant disposition circumstances, the expiry of the term of validity of recognition of each of the instant courses and the course of the recognition of recognition of each of the instant courses, from September 17, 2013, the validity period of recognition on September 17, 2013 expires.
On September 2, 2014, the Defendant revoked the recognition of the 1 and 2 process of a human resource manager pursuant to Article 19(2)5 of the Vocational Skills Development Act on the ground that the Defendant operated the 1 and 2 course against the details recognized by the Plaintiff.
2..