A. The facts of recognition 1) The Defendant is a company that engages in the imported vehicle repair business, and the Plaintiff A is employed by the Defendant from January 201 to October 2014 and served as the head of the E Service Center’s team. The Plaintiff A retires from office on February 27, 2014, and the Plaintiff A retires from office on February 19, 2014. Accordingly, the Defendant’s executive officers participated in the transmission screening form prepared in the Seoul FF “G” restaurant in Songpa-gu (hereinafter “instant restaurant”), and the number of employees of the E Service Center was 40.

At around 21:00 on the same day, several employees of the Lao E Service Center from the restaurant to the outside of the restaurant have taken commemorative photographs with the Plaintiff at the front of the restaurant, and Plaintiff A was deprived of the ground as it was, because Plaintiff A was not properly removed while falling off due to the Plaintiff’s failure to receive the Plaintiff A’s strawing.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). Due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as the pressure of 7 plehional pressure.

3) Plaintiff A continued to serve in the Defendant Company after the instant case and retired from office around October 2014. Plaintiff B’s wife, Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff D are children of Plaintiff A.

B. According to Article 756 of the Civil Code establishing liability, a person who has had another person engage in a business by using another person shall be liable for damages incurred by an employee to a third party in connection with the performance of his/her business. The phrase "in relation to the performance of his/her business, which is the requirement for an employer's liability as stipulated under the above provision," means that if an employee's tort appears objectively to be an act of an employer's business or an act of performing his/her business or related thereto, it shall be regarded as an act of performing his/her business without considering the actor's subjective circumstances. If the employee intentionally committed a harmful act against