When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who works as the director of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Reconstruction Project Association.

1. The Defendant of defamation, at around 14:00 on December 17, 2016, was held at the 10th anniversary of the establishment of the E University in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, the 10th century, and the victim F, the president of the association, was elected to the president of the association by a special election for the president of the association, did not trade the shares of the association members, and did not have paid 300 million won in return for the transfer of the president of the association to G, the former president of the association. However, the Defendant did not have a record of “Isssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

However, the PPPS.

It is necessary that the head of the association transferred to the former president, because the former president was changed, what is now, the former president of the association transferred the former president’s position to the former president of the association. It is required that the G president of the association transferred the former president of the association from a few months before the latter. Whether the former president of the association transferred his position to the latter president of the Korean F association.

300 million won dynasty

“The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

2. The Defendant’s insult at the time and place as described in paragraph 1, and the Victim F, who had shown in society at the time, was not the victim’s soil bather.

In addition, the term "" refers to the "satisfy" and the sound satisfy satisfy" using microphones, among approximately 240 members present at the meeting at the time.

How to re-rupate soil?

“,” and “the victim may cause the victim to do so.”

"Influent person" shall be the one who is asked.

In other words, “the victim was openly insulting”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. The head of the complaint, two copies of the fact confirmation source, the investigation report (Submission of a record of special general meetings), the newsletters of the cooperative.