A. On the day of the instant case, the Defendant: (a) received a communication with the Defendant that pro-Japaneses D are being wraped at “G essential points”; (b) had already been in the state of termination of fighting, but (c) the Victim J was now in the state of termination of fighting; and (d) the Defendant was only in the face of J when the Defendant’s cream was creamed at the time of the Defendant’s cream; (b) had the face and body of H by drinking together with D and E 20 to 30 times, as indicated in the facts charged in the lower judgment, and did not go through 7 to 8 parts of his body, or caused the Defendant’s head to be sealed on the wall.

B. The sentence (one million won of fine) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances admitted by the evidence duly admitted by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the court below is just in finding the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case based on the evidence presented by the court below, and there is no error of mistake of facts as

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

① 피해자 H은 D, E과 피고인이 자신을 폭행하였고, 동거녀인 피해자 J가 이전부터 알고 있던 피고인에게 ‘뭐하는 거예요’라고 하면서 말리자 피고인이 J을 주점 밖 엘리베이터 쪽으로 끌고 가 세게 밀어 복도 벽에 뒤통수를 부딪히게 하여 쿵 소리가 났으며, J이 5분 정도 기절하였다고 진술하였는데, 그 진술 내용이 구체적이고, 사건발생일인 2012. 3. 15.로부터 얼마 지나지 않은 2012. 4. 23.에 진술한 것이며, 사건 인지 경위(D, E, 피고인이 H을 폭행하였다는 제보)에 비추어 볼 때 피해자 H이 D, E에게만 폭행을 당하였을 뿐 피고인으로부터는 폭행을 당하지 아니하였음에도 피고인에 관하여 허위의 진술을 하였다고 보이지 아니한다.

② The Victim J set D Ha in the presence of the main station H as a drinking, and E.