2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On October 1, 2016, the Plaintiff entered the printing circuit board processing company C (hereinafter “instant place of business”) located in the member-gu, Ansan-si (hereinafter “instant place of business”). On November 3, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) visited the D Hospital by asserting the Huri Mari Mari Mari Mari Mari; (b) was diagnosed on the escape certificate of conical signboards between 4-5 and 4-5 of the Hari-si (hereinafter “each of the instant case’s disease”); and (c) was subject to the diagnosis of the Mari Mari Mari Mari Mari Mari Mari (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

B. On August 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant for each of the instant injury and disease. However, on January 25, 2019, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to grant medical care on the ground that the Plaintiff rendered a disposition not to grant medical care on the ground that “the Plaintiff’s age, development circumstances, career, working environment, working period, working hours, work contents (including motion pictures), past calendars, medical records, and video medical records, etc. were examined, and the Defendant carried out the processing of the printed circuit board, etc.; the degree and frequency of transport of heavy objects, and detailed attitude at the time of performing his/her duties, etc.; however, it is confirmed that there was a little burden on each of the instant injury and disease on the ground that the proximate causal relation with each of the instant injury and disease is not determined as

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, each entry in Gap’s 2 through 4 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion conducted the reorganization and delivery work of goods, mechanical painting work, equipment maintenance work, etc. at the place of business of this case, and it is reasonable to view that the plaintiff's assertion made the main cause of causing the injury and disease of this case in the form of repeated movement of weight while he bending.

Therefore, the defendant's disposition of this case, which was made on a different premise, should be revoked in an unlawful manner.

B. 1 The Plaintiff is a Earinant and a printed circuit board in the instant workplace.