beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.06.21 2017고단464

상해등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for two months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants jointly committed a theft and possessed by the Defendants.

D Along with a driver's license and a resident registration certificate, a public invitation was made to purchase or open a mobile phone at a mobile phone store.

A. According to the aforementioned public offering, the Defendants were required to present identification cards to confirm their identity at the mobile phone store of “F” located in Si/Gunsan-si, Gunsan-si, on December 17, 2016, by opening the mobile phone from the mobile phone store of “F”.

Defendant A presented as if he was the driver’s license and resident registration certificate of Defendant A, which was a stolen official document, and D’s first class driver’s license under the name of the head of Gangseo-gu Seoul Regional Police Agency, and D’s resident registration certificate under the name of the head of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. G, the main owner of which is Seoul, is Seoul, and Defendant B was in a relationship with Defendant A, and Defendant B was in a relationship with Defendant A, and was in a relationship with Defendant B’s house located in Gunsan.

The term "" refers to the following.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use official document in a fraudulent manner.

B. The Defendants, in collusion, prepared an application form for joining in order to open a mobile phone in the name of D at the same time and place, and signed the application form with “D” stated in the applicant column.

As a result, the Defendants forged the application form for mobile telephone subscription in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

(c)

The Defendants conspired to do so at the above time and place to F business owners G who are aware of the forgery at the above time and place, and exercised the forged application form as if it was duly formed.

(d)

The defrauded Defendants presented Category 1 Ordinary Driving License and Resident Registration Certificate to Victim G who is the owner of the business at the above date and time, and they are as if Defendant A was D.