However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 3, 2013, at around 05:45, the Defendant driven a B-learning car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.203% without obtaining a driver’s license, on the road of the tax office located in the Dong-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the statement of the state of drinking drivers, report on the state of drinking driving, and inquiry into the results of drinking control;

1. License inquiry, details of revocation, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to disqualified inquiry;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (2) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (the punishment imposed on a violation of the Road Traffic Act of heavier punishment);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigations under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., factors such as a violation of an error in depth and a violation of the punishment for a suspended sentence or heavier punishment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act or more of community service and lecture attendance order;