A. Comprehensively taking account of the facts stated in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3 as to the cause of the claim and the fact finding to the head of Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju District Court, the plaintiff (previous company) applied for payment order (E) against Eul around 2016 and notified the plaintiff of the payment order (E) on August 27, 2016. "E shall pay the plaintiff 2,428,018 won and delay damages." On June 24, 1989, Eul succeeded to 1/19 of the FF large 3617 square meters, which was 3617 square meters, and then donated the above share to the defendant on December 1, 2014, and it cannot be acknowledged that the plaintiff transferred the above share to the plaintiff on December 29, 2014, which was subject to the above transfer of the share to the plaintiff's heir on December 29, 2014.

According to the above facts of recognition, the above shares of E, the sole property of which are the defendant, reduced the joint security of general creditors, including the plaintiff's successor, and thus, the contract of this case constitutes a fraudulent act against the plaintiff's successor, who is the plaintiff's creditor, and the defendant's bad faith is presumed.

B. The Defendant asserted that this case’s gift contract does not constitute a fraudulent act since the preserved claim occurred after the gift contract of this case. However, in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement No. 2, E did not pay the interest on the money borrowed from H, Inc., and lost the benefit of time around 2002. The Korea Asset Management Corporation that acquired the above claim against E.