2. After an appeal is filed.

A. The Plaintiffs are married couple.

The plaintiffs and the defendant live in the vicinity of the area adjacent to the area adjacent to the area adjacent to the area adjacent to the Gyeong-gun, North Korea.

B. On June 1, 2018, at around 19:30, the Defendant: (a) committed an injury on the Plaintiff’s knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, tension, and dnee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, kne, kne, knee, kne, kne, etc. to the Plaintiff, who was found

(hereinafter “instant assault, etc.”). B.

The Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 on September 20, 2018 due to the instant assault, etc., and the said summary order was finalized as it is.

2. Determination as to Plaintiff A’s claim

A. Plaintiff A’s assertion not only incurred property damage equivalent to KRW 3,514,00 in total, including medical expenses of KRW 941,514 in the instant assault, etc., KRW 2,452,50 in total, but also incurred property damage equivalent to KRW 3,514,014 in preparation of recording for securing evidentiary materials, but also suffered emotional distress. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff a total of KRW 3,514,014 in total, KRW 15,00,00 in consolation money and KRW 15,00 in total,00 in total, KRW 108,514,00 in the instant assault, etc., and delay damages therefrom.

B. First, we examine the occurrence of liability for damages.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant's assault of this case, etc. against the plaintiff A constitutes a tort against the plaintiff. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff A due to damages caused by tort.

The following points are examined as to the scope of damages.

According to the evidence Nos. 5 and 7, in order to treat the injury suffered by the Plaintiff’s assault, etc. of this case, the sum of KRW 809,104 shall be from June 2, 2018 to August 16, 2018.