Seized evidence 1 to 4 and 6 shall be confiscated.

The defendant shall pay compensation to the applicant.

As the total liability for the crime of fraud in the name of telephone financing fraud " Bosping" and the crime of fraud in the Internet sales ice, the person soliciting the Defendant through a person using the ID called "D," a person who would receive money from the above money from the financial account in cash and deliver the money to the designated person by his name in cash. The Defendant: (a) kept the electronic bank account in the name of E, issued through a person using the ID called "D," and (b) kept the electronic bank account (Account Number G) with the bank account in the name of E (Account Number G) and H; and (c) by doing so, the Defendant conspired to commit the above fraud in sequence with a person who uses the ID, "D," and a person who uses the ID, and to transfer the money deposited into the above financial account to another account.

1. Fraud;

A. On June 21, 2018, in collusion with a person who uses a nameless box, “D” or “D,” as above, the Defendant under the Bosing Water Act assumes that the nameless person assumes the victim M bank N via the telephone number K to the victim by misrepresenting him/her as M bank N, and that the Defendant is 30 million won at a low interest rate if he/she redeems the term loan.

Then, in repayment of the term loan, I would like to make a false statement that “I transfer money under the name of repayment of the term loan to the account known by us immediately to the extent of lending.” At around 14:44 on June 22, 2018, I would have received 600,000 won from the damaged party to the F Bank account under the E’s name, and the Defendant released 6 million won from the “P” that was located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Incheon, using the F Bank’s Postal Card connected to the above F Bank account under the name of E, to which the said amount was remitted. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 24239, Jun. 22, 2018; Presidential Decree No. 24239, Jun. 15, 2018; Presidential Decree No. 24200, Jun.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with a person who uses a name-free box, “D” or “D,” and the facts are also employees of financial institutions.