A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for six months.

1. Defendant A, who completed the marriage report with D on September 17, 1981, is a spouse who was married, and, at around 14:00 on July 17, 2007, entered into a single-time interchange with Defendant B at the heading room on the first floor of the Fmomomo-gun E located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnamyang-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do;

2. Defendant B, despite being aware that Defendant A was a woman with her husband, was sexual intercourse with Defendant A once, at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of a witness A, G, D, and H;

1. Copy of the family register;

1. The defendant B and the defense counsel's assertion of each investigation report, the defendant B and the defense counsel asserted that the defendant B had no sexual intercourse with the defendant A.

Therefore, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, the Defendants appear to have continuously been able to reach the school system after the first call around 1998, and Defendant B was engaged in monetary transactions, such as remitting money to Defendant A. Defendant A, even though the prosecution was instituted and punished, Defendant A was faced with the prosecution, the fact of sexual intercourse was netly observed, and Defendant B made concrete statements on the place where Defendant B her life and her deaf company, Defendant B’s friendship relationship, etc., and H did not have special interest with the Defendants in this court without this court, stating to the effect that “The Defendants were going to know that Defendant A had been carrying out a abortion surgery with the Defendants at the same time,” and even if not related with the Defendants, it was extremely high that Defendant A’s credibility falls under the case of this case, in light of the fact that Defendant B was sexual intercourse.

Defendant

B and defense counsel’s assertion is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;