A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment shall be rendered against Defendant A.

The Defendants, in collusion with those names, led the government agencies in China by misrepresenting them or soliciting the theft of names or lending, etc. of money transfer to the bank cash withdrawal and Internet financial transaction system, etc., by inducing the victims to transfer the money to the bank account in advance. The Defendants, as such, intended to acquire the money by means of so-called “Sishing” method, which withdraws the money acquired through deception and delivers it to China, and (1) China's general book (in China and Korea's organizational management call center operation, remittance, withdrawal, and solicitation of passbook), (2) Korea's general book (in compliance with the Chinese book, under the direction of China's general book, management and education, remittance, withdrawal, solicitation of passbook), (3) personal book (in direct withdrawal of the criminal fund deposited in the passbook under the direction of China and the Korean general book), (4) remittance and exchange account books (an account transfer to China by collecting cash withdrawn by seal withdrawals), and (5) delivery of the passbook to Kwikset and delivery of the passbook to Kwikset and service).

Specifically, Defendant A’s statement that the above withdrawal method may be imposed 100,000 to 300,000 won per day from the above person’s false name, and Defendant B offered that the above withdrawal method should be applied to Defendant B on October 28, 2013, and Defendant B agreed that the above withdrawal method should be applied to Defendant B, while taking charge of the above withdrawal method, Defendant B conspired to receive 1.8% of the amount of the withdrawal amount by receiving the cash card from another person’s name at the place where the said withdrawal method was promised under the direction of the telephone financial fraud group and withdrawing the amount of damage.

On October 30, 2013, the above person under whose name the text message was sent to the victim E at a non-permanent location, stating that “The possibility of lending the low interest rate to the State is possible with the government policy,” and reported this to the victim who called the phone, “In order to obtain a loan, the person under whose name the text message was sent to him/her, should also pay for all the existing loans.”