However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On June 2016, Defendant 201, the 2017 Highest 662, Defendant 2, who runs the construction business under the trade name “D” in the former Southern-gun C, the Defendant agreed that the victim F’s office located in Jindo-gun E before having been awarded a contract from the victim of the H repair work in the newanan-gun, Haan-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the victim was awarded a contract for KRW 14,7225,00 from the victim of the H repair work in the newan-gun, Haan-gun, which was awarded a successful contract by the Defendant for the said construction work, the Defendant shall claim the expenses incurred therein to the victim and shall pay the victim the money that the victim actually sustained from the damage.

A. At the time of stone acquisition, the Defendant requested the above H repair work to Skinn Co., Ltd. to perform the construction work in addition to the above construction work, and around that time, the Defendant was performing the construction work under the Defendant’s responsibility even at another construction site other than the above construction work, and it was difficult to pay personnel expenses and construction expenses in another construction site. Accordingly, even if the Defendant was to have used the money received from the injured party for the above personnel expenses and construction expenses, the Defendant would be able to pay the skinn Co., Ltd. for the amount of money paid

The author tried to acquire money by deceiving the damaged person.

On June 29, 2016, the Defendant filed a claim with the victim for KRW 22 million of public expenses in stone, under the pretext that the Defendant would be paid to Skinn Co., Ltd., which was in charge of the construction of stone of H repair work at the office of the above “D” office.

However, even if the Defendant received the above money from the injured party, the Defendant did not intend to pay it to Skinn Co., Ltd.

On July 4, 2016, the Defendant received KRW 22 million from the injured party as a public expense for stone and acquired it through the account in the name of J. On August 30, 2016, and received KRW 14.3 million as a public expense in stone by deceiving the injured party by the same method as around August 30, 2016.